Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-18 13:25:26
Message-ID: 16762.1034947526@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I don't have a lot of options for testing it - should I just apply the
> changes and wait for the problems, or can someone offer a bigendian machine
> and/or a 4 byte off_t machine?

My HP is big-endian; send in the patch and I'll check it here...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2002-10-18 13:47:56 Re: Postgresql and multithreading
Previous Message Mats Lofkvist 2002-10-18 09:21:03 Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes