Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Date: 2021-06-10 16:04:20
Message-ID: 1675960.1623341060@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> If you really feel that strongly about not changing this then I can
> drop this. However, I'll likely growl every time I see "a SQL" in the
> docs from now on.

[ shrug... ] I'm not going to stand in your way. However, I'm also
unlikely to worry about this point when copy-editing docs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-06-10 16:07:52 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-06-10 16:03:06 Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic