Re: Why is lorikeet so unstable in v14 branch only?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is lorikeet so unstable in v14 branch only?
Date: 2022-03-26 21:19:43
Message-ID: 167387.1648329583@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 3/26/22 15:49, Andres Freund wrote:
>> One interesting bit in the config is:
>> [ lack of ]
>> 'update_process_title = off'

> I'd forgotten about that. Let me do that for REL_14_STABLE and see where
> we get to.

Hm. But if that does mitigate it, it still seems like a bug no?
Why would that be preferentially crashing partitioned-table creation?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-26 21:24:32 pg_stat_get_replication_slot() marked not strict, crashes
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-03-26 21:08:25 Re: Refactoring SSL tests