Re: Call for platforms

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-23 06:08:06
Message-ID: 16705.985327686@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> For the regression test, I got 7 failures, most of them seem harmless,
> the only concern I have is bit test though.

Most of the diffs derive from what I recall to be a known SunOS problem,
that strtol fails to notice overflow. A value that should be rejected
is getting inserted into int4_tbl (mod 2^32 of course).

The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-23 06:31:43 Re: Call for platforms
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-23 05:31:27 Re: Call for platforms

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rainer Mager 2001-03-23 06:19:36 Problems with latest tests
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-03-23 05:31:27 Re: Call for platforms