Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.11 vs. Postgres
Date: 2021-11-24 17:39:51
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 24.11.21 04:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>> According to [1], we need to stop including Python's <eval.h>.

> See attached patch. The minimum Python version for this change is 2.4,
> which is the oldest version supported by PG10, so we can backpatch this
> to all live branches.

LGTM. Tested with v10 and prairiedog's Python 2.4.1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-11-24 17:53:02 Re: Rename dead_tuples to dead_items in vacuumlazy.c
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2021-11-24 17:15:07 Re: Split xlog.c