Re: Build failure in current CVS (src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Build failure in current CVS (src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs)
Date: 2002-08-21 03:10:54
Message-ID: 16640.1029899454@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> IMO giving a directory to each conversion
> is more manageable than putting everything in single directory.

I lean towards Peter's point here. One or two files per conversion
is not unmanageable to keep in a single directory. And I have noticed
that "make" and "make install" are visibly slower than before because
they have to recurse into all these new subdirectories. I think the
accumulated developer time spent watching "make" will soon exceed any
possible benefit from splitting these files into subdirectories :-(

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-21 03:13:52 Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-08-21 02:15:51 Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in