Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Oliver Teuber <teuber(at)abyss(dot)devicen(dot)de>, Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL COPY syntax extension (was: Performance on inserts)
Date: 2000-08-28 17:48:43
Message-ID: 16612.967484923@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> That syntax is a lot like a real SQL9x INSERT.

Multiple row constructors in INSERT is one of my to-do items for the
planned querytree redesign. I have not thought it was worth messing
with until we're ready to bite that bullet, however.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-08-28 17:56:28 Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-08-28 17:32:58 Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)