Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Matthew Terenzio <matt(at)jobsforge(dot)com>
Cc: PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-13 02:17:35
Message-ID: 16563.1129169855@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Matthew Terenzio <matt(at)jobsforge(dot)com> writes:
> As much as I respect Marc and Postgresql.org, I can't see Oracle hiring
> him away as a "killer" threat to the community. People would set up
> camp somewhere else, like Command Prompt. It would hurt things for a
> while but the software is too important to too many to be killed by a
> domain name or person.

Yeah, I was thinking that myself: even if a hostile group managed to
obtain control of the trademark and/or domain name, they could not kill
the project. We'd just regroup under a new name --- it'd slow us down
for a bit, sure, but no more. The project name has changed once
already, remember.

The only serious threat I see on the horizon is patent issues. Again,
I don't think that could kill us over the long term --- we could surely
write our way out of any noncritical patents (see recent ARC fiasco for
a fire drill of this nature), and we ourselves are prior art with which
to defeat any patents on critical algorithms. A patent lawsuit could
certainly hurt us, if only by soaking up the time and attention of key
developers, but I don't think it could kill the project.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-13 02:19:22 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-10-13 02:15:21 Re: mysql woes

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-13 02:19:22 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-13 02:12:52 Re: db size reporting