Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for
Date: 2005-04-19 04:46:06
Message-ID: 16521.1113885966@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Guys, is this patch ready for application? I think so, but am not 100%
> sure.

I haven't read the code yet, but in any case I still object to choosing
Oracle-like names for Oracle-incompatible functionality. We need to
settle on better names.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-04-19 04:55:33 Re: Problem with PITR recovery
Previous Message John Hansen 2005-04-19 04:12:23 Re: Call to build-in operator from new operator

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2005-04-19 05:00:20 Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-19 04:44:02 Re: How to include "EXCEPTION" handling block in PL/TCL function.