Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Guys, is this patch ready for application? I think so, but am not 100%
> sure.
I haven't read the code yet, but in any case I still object to choosing
Oracle-like names for Oracle-incompatible functionality. We need to
settle on better names.
regards, tom lane