Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Date: 2004-08-09 17:02:11
Message-ID: 16487.1092070931@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Oh. Then I have a different bug to report, because INITDB for Sunday's CVS
> would not run without the -L option.

Well, that does deserve investigation. But I've been initdb'ing
frequently and not noticed any problems. What configure switches
did you use exactly? Did you try to move the installation tree
after configure?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-09 17:11:01 Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-09 16:57:33 Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-09 17:11:01 Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-09 16:57:33 Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?