Re: Archives policy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Archives policy
Date: 2009-04-16 14:01:16
Message-ID: 16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> Can I get comments/objections/opinions on this draft policy please?
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Archives_Policy

Hmm, the first section suggests that there are cases where we will
de-archive messages, and then the second lays out all the reasons
why we won't and why it's useless to ask. So I'm still confused
what the policy is. I would be happy with a policy that says
"The archives are graven on stone tablets. Don't bother asking."
but if we are willing to editorialize in extreme cases then maybe
the second part needs to be modified.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-04-16 14:05:10 Re: Archives policy
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-04-16 08:07:05 Archives policy