Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT
Date: 2012-12-21 16:22:03
Message-ID: 16397.1356106923@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> writes:
> Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after
> INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.

What about before it, ie

STRICT UPDATE ...

This should dodge the problem of possible conflict with table names,
and it seems to me to read more naturally too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Gomes 2012-12-21 16:25:03 Writing Trigger Functions in C
Previous Message David Johnston 2012-12-21 16:13:20 Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT