Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Date: 2004-03-08 21:24:30
Message-ID: 16342.1078781070@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> Comments longer than ~7k would need a toast table. At the moment, toast
> tables don't work on a global basis.

Sure they do ... in fact, all the shared catalogs have one.

I think the idea of putting comments directly into pg_shadow and friends
is too icky to consider, though. If we really wanted to support this
stuff then we'd make *one* shared table that is just like
pg_description, but is used for shared objects.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-08 21:29:41 Re: socket calls in signal handler (WAS: APC + socket restrictions un der Win32?)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-08 21:18:31 Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]