Re: count * performance issue

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: count * performance issue
Date: 2008-03-08 06:13:12
Message-ID: 16334.1204956792@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> I know when I'm playing with pgbench the primary key index on the big
> accounts table is 1/7 the size of the table, and when using that table
> heavily shared_buffers ends up being mostly filled with that index. The
> usage counts are so high on the index blocks relative to any section of
> the table itself that they're very sticky in memory. And that's toy data;
> on some of the webapps people want these accurate counts for the ratio of
> index size to table data is even more exaggerated (think web forum).

Remember that our TOAST mechanism acts to limit the width of the
main-table row.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message paul rivers 2008-03-08 07:11:19 Re: count * performance issue
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2008-03-08 05:31:42 Re: count * performance issue