| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Future versions of psqlODBC |
| Date: | 2006-03-22 14:48:24 |
| Message-ID: | 16298.1143038904@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> We could just return to plain old psqlodbc/PostgreSQL ?
Please. This is going to be confusing enough anyway.
Do you expect to resurrect the separate ANSI/Unicode driver versions
someday? If so, please consider making the build create both driver
names right away, even if there's not any distinction at the moment.
Otherwise you'll be creating useless thrash in the packaging and
people's odbcinst.ini files, as they have to change the driver name
only to have to change it again later.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-22 14:54:19 | Re: Future development |
| Previous Message | Bart Samwel | 2006-03-22 14:42:34 | Re: Future development |