| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Change default of jit to off |
| Date: | 2026-03-20 16:24:27 |
| Message-ID: | 1629115.1774023867@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> writes:
> ISTM there's a clear consensus to get this committed for PG19, so
> barring objections I'll take care of that in the next couple days.
> Unless someone else wants to ...
+1
> Another option would be to leave that for mid-beta, which is where we
> tweaked the io_method GUCs last year. But we did that to get some
> testing for 'worker' (in case we revert to 'sync'), and we don't need
> that for jit.
Doesn't seem like something to change mid-beta. If it makes anyone
unhappy, we'd best find out sooner not later.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2026-03-20 16:27:49 | Re: Fixes inconsistent behavior in vacuum when it processes multiple relations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-03-20 16:22:25 | Re: TupleDescAttr bounds checks |