Re: LIMIT BASED ON PERCENT

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Lee Hachadoorian <lee(dot)hachadoorian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIMIT BASED ON PERCENT
Date: 2009-11-18 19:39:34
Message-ID: 162867790911181139s38dd9ae4n7b1474523d3f2c3b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

2009/11/18 Lee Hachadoorian <lee(dot)hachadoorian(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> yes, and don't use 20%.
>>
>> select * from foo order by somecol limit (select (count(*)*0.2)::int from foo)
>>
>> Regards
>> Pavel
>
> Is this faster on a large table? Because (select (count(*)*20/100)) worked fine.
>

this is +/- same - 20/100 is maybe about 0.000001% faster - you don't
need one float to query cast, but this operation is only one pqr
query. The problem is two full scan of table.

Pavel

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Kewley 2009-11-19 00:20:24 Re: LIMIT BASED ON PERCENT
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-11-18 19:35:22 Re: LIMIT BASED ON PERCENT