| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parsing config files in a directory |
| Date: | 2009-10-29 14:46:12 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790910290746q1e243c6dteca053400311af6e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>
>>
>
> Really, they don't know any Perl or Python or Java either? Maybe.
>
> Anyway, it seems to me a whole lot better than inventing a new thing that
> makes "custom_variable_class" as something to append to
> "custom_variable_classes". If you're going to insist on using "append foo =
> 'x'" at least let it apply to the list that is actually being appended to,
> so we don't need to keep track of singular and plural forms. That's the part
> of your suggestion I really object to.
>
I have to agree with you. From language view is += syntax better.
Actually, i would to see some more verbose syntax. There are two
significantly different behave and only one difference is one symbol.
But I don't know better syntax.
Regards
Pavel
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-10-29 15:17:34 | Re: Parsing config files in a directory |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2009-10-29 14:30:09 | Re: Parsing config files in a directory |