Re: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vs ownership
Date: 2009-10-02 17:56:59
Message-ID: 162867790910021056u5cb7c0b5s6de75ee04b2db907@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/10/2 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> My inclination is to think that the right behavior for REPLACE FUNCTION
>> is to keep the old proowner and proacl values, because that's what it
>> always has done and nobody's complained.
>
> +1.

+1
Pavel

>
>        Stephen
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkrGMm4ACgkQrzgMPqB3kiiA5wCgis9FDnbm3wQ2cktKDxOK2hjL
> ZqQAnRHl3rnXTki4WUBcS+iiZRWuzvSU
> =Uq6m
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-10-02 18:14:30 Re: latest hstore patch
Previous Message Richard Rowell 2009-10-02 17:46:10 LIMIT 1 == EXISTS optimization?