Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

2009/10/1 Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2009/9/30 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> So I dropped variadic functions from mixed/named notation and little
>> bit modified documentation. Please, can some native English speaker
>> look on documentation?
>>
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> I've had a look through the documentation and cleaned up a few things.
>  I changed the chapter heading from "Positional and named notation" to
> "Calling Functions".  I felt that the original heading would not give
> a clear hint about the subject matter to anyone who wasn't already
> familiar with the terminology.
>
> The rest of my changes are rephrasing sentences, fixing spelling and
> grammar, and cleaning up indentation and wrapping.  The code examples
> are not changed and I haven't meddled with the structure of the
> chapter.
>
> I hope you find this helpful.

yes, it's very helpful. I thing, so there is all what is important.

thank you
Pavel

>
> Cheers,
> BJ
>