Re: mixed, named notation support

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mixed, named notation support
Date: 2009-07-18 09:26:58
Message-ID: 162867790907180226o75f22d33v3ae8a9c17297ad1d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/7/18 Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>:
> --On Donnerstag, März 05, 2009 08:41:28 +0100 Pavel Stehule
> <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I did some cleaning on this feature, and I hope so I solve some Tom's
>> objections
>
> Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch, the one linked from the
> commit fest has some hunks failing to be applied to current CVS. This is
> mainly for reporting and backup purposes, i'm proceeding looking into the
> code deeper now. The patch passes make check and functionality check looks
> fine.
>
> Pavel, should I adjust the docs already (you've asked for volunteers...)? If
> yes, have you something specific in mind?

sure, please. Doc needs mainly language correction - my English is
bad. And maybe some others - from me is too short and too technical.

Pavel

>
> --
>  Thanks
>
>                   Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2009-07-18 10:09:54 Re: Index AM API changes for deferability
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-07-18 06:32:59 Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object