Re: psql Feature request \set query

2008/10/23 Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
> For making psql fully scriptable I would think it would be smarter to embed
> a full well-supported existing language rather than trying to invent a new
> one.

plpgsql?

regards
Pavel

>
> If we do want to to that I would suggest looking at lua which is intended to
> be used this way.
>
> greg
>
> On 23 Oct 2008, at 05:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>>
>>> "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "We can't do anything unless we do everything" is a recipe for
>>>> failure.
>>
>>> True enough, but a car doesn't roll without at least four wheels.
>>
>> Perhaps more to the point: you don't have to implement every part of a
>> set of features at the same time, but it's a good idea to design them
>> all together. Else you risk writing something that doesn't play nice
>> with the other parts; and by the time you find out, it's too late to
>> change without creating a backwards-compatibility problem.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>