Re: statement_cost_limit for regression testing.

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: statement_cost_limit for regression testing.
Date: 2008-09-02 09:35:48
Message-ID: 162867790809020235s37293ef2sc1b7b4c92d4aedaa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2008/9/2 Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hello Simon,
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 19:57 -0700, Ryan Bradetich wrote:
>>> I just wanted to throw out another possible use for this GUC. There
>>> maybe a better way to
>>> solve this problem, but I believe this patch would be useful for
>>> regression testing.
>> It's possible to do this using planner hooks, so no patch needed.
>
> Excellent!
>
> Time for me to read up on using these planner hooks.
>
> Thanks!

it should be nice contrib module :)
Pavel

>
> - Ryan
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-02 09:44:31 Re: Window functions patch v04 for the September commit fest
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-09-02 09:30:16 Re: rmgr hooks and contrib/rmgr_hook