Re: Storage Model for Partitioning

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Storage Model for Partitioning
Date: 2008-01-11 10:59:14
Message-ID: 162867790801110259v7fc706f5l6966815df380f921@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> 3. Partitions are RelFileNodes, but not Tables
>
> We allow a table to have multiple RelFileNodes, when explicitly declared
> that way.
>
> This means we have to change
> - DDL changes to allow TABLE level changes to apply to all RelFileNodes,
> while PARTITION level changes to apply to only one RelFileNode
> - indexes, so they can refer to more than one partition
> - share locking in the executor
> - changes to allow synchronous scans and buffer recycling
>
> There *are* other changes not mentioned here that are required for
> partitioning, which although complex are less doubtful.
>
It can be used for global temporary tables with some modification

table defines structure and partitions defines contents for sessions.

Regards
Pavel Stehule
> Simon Riggs
> 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2008-01-11 11:34:17 Re: Storage Model for Partitioning
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-11 10:25:40 Storage Model for Partitioning