Re: CommitFest rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CommitFest rules
Date: 2008-07-07 18:37:57
Message-ID: 16268.1215455877@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> On 7/5/08, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
>> I think people are still working there way through the process, but it's
>> starting to sound like submitting a patch involves two steps from now on;
>> email to the list, and add your patch to the next commitfest page. Does that
>> sound right?

> yeah! that was always the process... email to -hackers the proposal,
> design, discussion, etc... email to -patches the patch itself... the
> only change is that we are no longer using -patches for this but the
> commitfest page.

No, you still have to mail the actual patch to the lists, we've just
agreed that it's okay to send patches to -hackers. Commitfest entries
pointing to random websites rather than the PG mail archives are not
acceptable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriano Lange 2008-07-07 18:42:13 GEQO Publications
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-07-07 18:17:48 Re: CommitFest rules