| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Date: | 2004-08-09 16:49:23 |
| Message-ID: | 16226.1092070163@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> It might be worth absolut-izing this path in initdb before it's
>> passed down, but I can't get exceedingly excited about it.
> Well, once again let me check the docs to make sure people are warned about
> this ....
Why would it matter? I don't think I've ever once had occasion to use
the -L switch in initdb, because it figures it out just fine for itself.
People who are using it should be wizardly enough to know about the
chdir.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 16:57:33 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 16:42:41 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 16:57:33 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-09 16:42:41 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |