Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber
Date: 2026-08-07 05:00:01
Message-ID: 162247ba-7d2c-427a-bbf6-a6c5daa6d71f@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Amit and Zhijie,

06.08.2026 12:12, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 10:55 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>> The patch fixes the timeout on my machine (after adding the mentioned pg_sleep(0.5)).
> The patch looks good to me, so I pushed.

Thank you for fixing the test!

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikita Malakhov 2026-08-07 05:00:44 Re: JSON_TABLE: table => column ON ERROR propagation
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-08-07 04:30:57 Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions