Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date: 2009-07-23 14:39:51
Message-ID: 16213.1248359991@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder if it would be helpful to have a buildfarm option whereby
>> it would fetch the latest nightly-snapshot tarball and use that instead
>> of a CVS pull.

> That is certainly doable. It would be in effect a forced run, because we
> would have no notion of what had changed. Presumably, this would only be
> for HEAD - we don't do daily snapshots of the back branches, do we?

There was just recently some discussion of providing daily snapshots
for the most recent back branch or two. I'm not sure if that's up
and running, but the consensus seemed to be that it was a good idea.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-23 14:45:03 Re: Higher TOAST compression.
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-07-23 14:36:38 Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5