Re: Separation walsender & normal backends

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Separation walsender & normal backends
Date: 2017-04-25 14:34:20
Message-ID: 16135.1493130860@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I've for a while suspected that the separation & duplication of
> infrastructure between walsenders and normal backends isn't nice.

I think we should consider a more radical solution: trying to put
general SQL query capability into the replication protocol was a
bad idea and we should revert it while we still can. The uglinesses
you mention aren't merely implementation issues, they're an indication
that that concept is broken in itself.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-04-25 14:40:49 Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2017-04-25 14:31:05 Re: Crash observed during the start of the Postgres process