Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?

From: Jim Finnerty <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date: 2020-12-10 16:07:22
Message-ID: 1607616442920-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

What is the current status of the 64-bit XID topic? Was an updated patch
ever posted to a different thread as suggested by Andres, or is v5 the
latest patch available? Is anyone developing a heap64 storage plugin?

I'm in the process of applying the v5 patch set just to understand what was
done, but the patches didn't all apply cleanly and so I've been doing a lot
of manual cleanup. It's a big patch set. It's obvious that a huge amount
of work and thought has gone into this.

-----
Jim Finnerty, AWS, Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL
--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2020-12-10 16:15:12 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Lukas Meisegeier 2020-12-10 15:49:35 Feature Proposal: Add ssltermination parameter for SNI-based LoadBalancing