Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: VACUUM FULL deadlock with backend startup

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL deadlock with backend startup
Date: 2011-03-20 06:24:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
> <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
>> then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
>> path is avoided.

> Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.

I want to take a closer look at this one because I thought I'd covered
all those issues in the last go-round.  But right offhand Nikhil's
analysis seems sane.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2011-03-20 10:08:43
Subject: Re: I am confused after reading codes of PostgreSQLthree week
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-03-20 04:44:25
Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group