Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interaction of PITR backups and Bulkoperationsavoiding WAL
Date: 2007-03-20 18:24:10
Message-ID: 16013.1174415050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:57:18PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> It's certainly a quicker fix. Unless others object, I'll set
>> archive_command to only be changeable at server startup.

> I think the docs should also explain why it's server-start only, since
> if someone wanted to they could circumvent the behavior by having
> archive_command call a shell script that changes it's behavior.

Um, what's the problem with that? The concern was about whether PG
would produce consistent WAL output, not whether the archive_command
actually needed to do anything.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-03-20 18:38:36 Re: Indexam interface proposal
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-20 18:24:00 Money type todos?