Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 15:37, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
>> -1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion
>> that would be added to existing uses.
> Given the expense, perhaps we need to different (overloaded) functions instead?
That would be a workable solution, but I continue to not believe that
this is useful enough to be worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2012-03-09 17:29:55|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-03-09 17:14:00|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|