| From: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: auxiliary functions for record type |
| Date: | 2010-12-11 14:17:44 |
| Message-ID: | 159C2B94-C953-4F06-AB62-CE2DC293EFCF@phlo.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec11, 2010, at 06:20 , Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I wrote a few functions for record type - record_expand,
> record_get_fields, record_get_field, record_set_fields.
Just FYI, I've created something similar a while ago. The code can be found at
https://github.com/fgp/pg_record_inspect
The main difference seems to be that my code allows you to retrieve fields from a record without casting it to text. As a consequence, however, it lacks the set-returning functions that your's provides. It also doesn't provide a way to modify fields.
Still, maybe we could join efforts here? I certain would *love* to see something like this either as a contrib module or in core.
best regards,
Florian Pflug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-12-11 14:28:22 | Re: PS display and standby query conflict |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-12-11 13:27:37 | Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes |