Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
Date: 2013-01-25 18:35:49
Message-ID: 15988.1359138949@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied a modified version of your patch that creates separate
> secondary index references for search_path.

This patch seems pretty bizarre. What is the difference between a
"configuration parameter" and a "run-time setting"? Why would you
point people to two different places for those two terms?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dhruv Ahuja 2013-01-25 18:36:49 Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status
Previous Message Dhruv Ahuja 2013-01-25 18:33:13 Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status