| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2022-01 Commitfest |
| Date: | 2022-02-02 18:00:18 |
| Message-ID: | 15915.1643824818@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:28:53AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> If we close all patches that had a review just because they weren't perfect in
>> their initial submission, we're just going to force everyone to re-register
>> their patch for every single commit fest. I don't see that doing anything
>> apart from making sure that everyone stops contributing.
> I had the same problem last time, "Returned with feedback" didn't feel
> fine in some cases.
Agreed, we're not here to cause make-work for submitters. RWF is
appropriate if the patch has been in Waiting On Author for awhile
and doesn't seem to be going anywhere, but otherwise we should
just punt it to the next CF.
Anyway, thanks to Julien for doing this mostly-thankless task
this time!
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2022-02-02 18:10:39 | Re: 2022-01 Commitfest |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-02 17:56:56 | Re: 2022-01 Commitfest |