| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch |
| Date: | 2010-02-10 14:46:21 |
| Message-ID: | 15869.1265813181@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I sort of assumed we might get some feedback from pgadmin or other
> tool writers between the time this was committed six months ago and
> now, but I haven't seen a single message from anyone who has actually
> tried to write a tool. As you imply, I think it will be very hard to
> change the format once this is released. At this point I think we may
> be stuck with using this format and hoping that it doesn't suck too
> badly.
We can still hope that some feedback comes in during beta. I think we
should be willing to adjust the output schema even late in beta, if
someone proposes a better idea.
But what we need to do is advertise for people to play around with
this...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-10 15:12:21 | Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2010-02-10 14:42:38 | Re: Writeable CTEs patch |