| From: | Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
| Date: | 2002-12-13 09:15:15 |
| Message-ID: | 15865.42275.526137.986176@kelvin.csl.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Making something binary incompatible IS an API change! In the case in
question an externally visible structure definition was changed -
clearly a change of API...
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > So if a recompile fixes it, increment minor, else major.
> >
> > Wrong --- if you need a recompile then it's not binary-compatible, so
> > it should be a major version bump.
>
> But the previous poster said only API changes were reasons to bump the
> major, right?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve King | 2002-12-13 09:27:08 | FW: Duplicate oids! |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2002-12-13 08:43:37 | Re: Creating a zero-column table |