Re: Patch queue concern

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Date: 2007-03-29 05:34:04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> My feeling is we should have more regular sync points where the patch
> queue is emptied and everything committed or rejected.

No doubt, but the real problem here is that reviewing/committing other
people's patches is not fun, it's just work :-(. So it's no surprise
that it tends to get put off. Not sure what to do about that.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Koichi Suzuki 2007-03-29 08:50:03 Re: [PATCHES] Full page writes improvement, code update
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-03-29 03:30:24 Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design