| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Arne Roland <A(dot)Roland(at)index(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) |
| Date: | 2022-01-17 23:11:22 |
| Message-ID: | 158358.1642461082@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2022-Jan-17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It makes zero sense to have the bits in AFTER_TRIGGER_TUP_BITS not
>> be adjacent. So what should happen here is to renumber the symbols
>> in between to move their bits over one place.
> Is it typical to enumerate bits starting from the right of each byte,
> when doing it from the high bits of the word? DONE and IN_PROGRESS have
> been defined as 0x1 and 0x2 of that byte for a very long time and I
> found that very strange. I am inclined to count from the left, so I'd
> pick 8 first, defining the set like this:
Doesn't matter to me either way, as long as the values look like they
were all defined by the same person ;-)
> (The fact that FDW_REUSE bits is actually an empty mask comes from
> 7cbe57c34dec, specifically [1])
That seemed a bit odd to me too, but this is not the patch to be
changing it in, I suppose.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-01-18 00:08:24 | Re: \d with triggers: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-01-17 23:08:02 | Re: Push down time-related SQLValue functions to foreign server |