| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature |
| Date: | 2011-02-28 06:20:32 |
| Message-ID: | 15829.1298874032@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 6:40 PM, I wrote:
>> I am planning on working on the documentation this weekend.
> And here's my attempt. The language is a bit poor at some places but I
> can't think of anything better.
Applied after some rather heavy editorialization.
> I tried to be more strict about using "subquery" when talking about
> WITHs in general since INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE is not a subquery in my book.
I undid most of those changes --- it didn't seem to add anything to be
strict in this way, and anyway you hadn't done it consistently,
eg the syntax still had "with_query".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-02-28 08:42:50 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-28 05:21:06 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE |