Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Parallel query execution

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel query execution
Date: 2013-01-16 07:07:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There are still 34 items needing attention in CF3.  I suggest that, if
> you have some spare time, your help would be very much appreciated
> there.  The commitfest that started on Jan 15th has 65 extra items.
> Anything currently listed in CF3 can rightfully be considered to be part
> of CF4, too.

In case you hadn't noticed, we've totally lost control of the CF
process.  Quite aside from the lack of progress on closing CF3, major
hackers who should know better are submitting significant new feature
patches now, despite our agreement in Ottawa that nothing big would be
accepted after CF3.  At this point I'd bet against releasing 9.3 during

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Abhijit Menon-SenDate: 2013-01-16 07:48:17
Subject: Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Previous:From: Michael PaquierDate: 2013-01-16 06:33:15
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group