Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files
Date: 2019-01-28 21:37:42
Message-ID: 15776.1548711462@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-01-28 13:02:11 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> It's not required by C99, it however is required by C11. But a lot of
>> compilers have allowed it as an extension for a long time (like before
>> C99), unless suppressed by some option.

> Hm, it's only in gcc 4.6, so that's probably too recent.

Yeah, I tried it with RHEL6's gcc 4.4.7, and it doesn't work
(and AFAICS there is no option that would make it work). A lot
of the buildfarm is running compilers older than that.

I fear we're still 10 years away from being able to demand C11
support ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-01-28 21:40:09 Re: backslash-dot quoting in COPY CSV
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-28 21:35:49 Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files