cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, performance)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: cross-posts (was Re: Large databases, performance)
Date: 2002-10-07 03:20:33
Message-ID: 15763.1033960833@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance pgsql-sql

Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> writes:
> ... Avoiding cross-posting would be nice, since I am getting lots of
> duplicate messages these days.

Cross-posting is a fact of life, and in fact encouraged, on the pg
lists. I suggest adapting. Try sending
set all unique your-email-address
to the PG majordomo server; this sets you up to get only one copy
of each cross-posted message.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Billy G. Allie 2002-10-07 06:01:13 Re: Proper Join and check
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-10-07 02:30:57 Re: Large databases, performance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-07 03:34:00 Re: Naming convention
Previous Message ellis 2002-10-07 02:37:08 Re: Moving to PostGres

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-10-07 09:37:29 Re: Large databases, performance
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-10-07 02:30:57 Re: Large databases, performance

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2002-10-07 09:37:29 Re: Large databases, performance
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-10-07 02:30:57 Re: Large databases, performance