Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:31:26 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Why do you not define the problem as "when we decide a view is
>> updateable and create the needed rules for it, also create default
>> values for it by copying up from the base tables"?
>>
> Well, that was our first thought. but what if the default value is
> changed in the base table?
So? Being able to have a different default for the view could be
construed as a feature, not a bug.
regards, tom lane