| From: | PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | jsalsman(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | monitoring-stats.html is too impenetrable |
| Date: | 2019-11-24 09:31:58 |
| Message-ID: | 157458791863.7229.15011272113637426410@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/monitoring-stats.html
Description:
There needs to be a tutorial page explaining how to use pg_stat_all_tables
to find missing indexes, or maybe just an example on monitoring-stats.html
which is hopelessly inaccessible to a non-expert. I would have never been
able to figure out anything close to the solution at
https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/e0rx8l/i_was_missing_a_single_index_and_omgf_everything/
from the existing docs. Thank you for your kind consideration of this
request; please do not hesitate to send instructions for how to submit a
pull request for this, as I would gladly do so. Best regards, -Jim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-25 01:20:36 | Re: monitoring-stats.html is too impenetrable |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2019-11-22 09:33:43 | Difference between Bulk Load (Multiple inserts or single inserts) and COPY |