The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced

From: PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: brian(dot)williams(at)mayalane(dot)com
Subject: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Date: 2019-11-07 14:32:02
Message-ID: 157313712259.14261.16141263269989647311@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/manage-ag-templatedbs.html
Description:

The use of the word virgin as an adjective is incorrect here and also an
anachronism. It is better off replaced with the word pristine - quotes
unnecessary. Note the word virgin appears in another page of the
documentation (a search will find it).

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-11-07 15:03:20 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2019-11-07 14:17:58 Nit: "Immutable" should be "pure"