Re: WIP: extensible enums

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Date: 2010-08-23 23:44:43
Message-ID: 15719.1282607083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's the three variants to do two things that I find unintuitive.

> I strongly suspect that you are in the minority on this one.

Yeah, seems like I'm losing the argument. Oh well.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-24 00:06:25 Re: Problem Using PQcancel in a Synchronous Query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-23 23:44:02 Re: Interruptible sleeps (was Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Yay, Kevin! Thanks, reviewers!)