From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |
Date: | 2010-09-26 19:27:41 |
Message-ID: | 15701.1285529261@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ? It's not hard to offer an option for that, I guess, but I foresee an
>> argument about what the default is going to be.
> If there's no clear consensus, I'm OK with the time-honored tie-break
> of "he who does the work...".
How about
Usage: git_changelog [--post-date/-p] [--since=SINCE]
--post-date Show branches made after a commit occurred
--since Print only commits dated since SINCE
? Got a better name for it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2010-09-26 19:45:28 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-26 19:24:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2010-09-26 19:45:28 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-26 19:24:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog. |